eXpress Yourself newZletter Vol. 2004  No. 3
 
CONTENTS OF THIS ISSUE:

110 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT IN THE SHADE
--- Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 exposes, enflames, and divides

DIALOGUE AS A MATTER OF SURVIVAL
---  What sets dialogue apart from all other forms of communication

NEITHER  DISCUSSION NOR DEBATE
----  How dialogue differs from telling, selling, or besting another 

BEHAVIORS THAT SUPPORT DIALOGUE
--- Just a little basic courtesy goes a long, long way

CREATING DIALOGUE :: FOUR SKILL BUILDING BLOCKS
--- It takes a little practice to change limiting beliefs

THE WORLD'S BEST "HOTTIE" AD
 ---  Be careful what personal ads you answer!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This issue is devoted entirely to the subject of DIALOGUE. 

I hear loud groans from some of you!  Ho hum, you say.  What's the big deal?  I know everything there is to know about dialogue.  Yessiree, use it all the time. 

I say, Really?  Well then, go out and jog around the block 100 times while the rest of us, who aren't afraid to peel away some limiting beliefs, take a penetrating look at DIALOGUE, second only to love as the most misunderstood, misused, and thoroughly abused subject in the arena of human relationships.

You're about to discover all that dialoguing you think you've been doing isn't dialogue at all.  If you don't believe me, you will be hard pressed to argue with some respected and powerful voices who lend their thoughts on DIALOGUE to this newsletter.

 You're about to find out what it takes to initiate real dialogue … why it always exists at the heart of genuine communication (where meaning being exchanged so understanding results) … and how to change your limiting beliefs and create genuine dialogue that respects another person's dignity, diversity, and voice of authentic self expression.

So, if you aren't jogging around the block at this moment, be prepared for a eye-opening adventure to unravel this tangled web called DIALOGUE.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

110 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT IN THE SHADE 

It was a newly released film that inspired me to focus on DIALOGUE for this edition of the newsletter … specifically Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, a documentary film that is sending political temperatures in the United States to the boiling point in an already tense electoral year. 

Here's the issue at point:  Is this movie initiating expansive, meaningful dialogues among those who have viewed it?  Is it stimulating real thought-provoking dialogues between and among nations, political parties, opinion leaders, the media, or the public at large? 

In most cases, the answer is a stupefying NO.  But it certainly has produced sensational entertainment, and how we do love to shellac serious issues with the gloss of sensationalism, entertaining or otherwise.

In case you've been living in the Mariana Trench or in outer space over the last few months, you might not know Fahrenheit 9/11 is a hyper-virulent, anti-Bush documentary exposing alleged links between the Bush family and that of al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden, who claimed responsibility for the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in New York and Washington. 

The film, along with a few others posing as documentaries, introduced a new category in political commentary, one called "political paranormal."  Catchy little label, don't you think? 

Fahrenheit 9/11 broke box office and attendance records for all documentary films.  How unexpected and big is that achievement?  Let's just say this film beat the opening weekend of George Lucas' s Return of the Jedi!  What's more, the French bestowed Mr. Moore with the prestigious and highly coveted Palme d'Or at this year's Cannes film festival. 

The following is a brief excerpt from an article reprinted in the Agence France Presse, June 4, 2004.  I took the liberty to italicize the hyper-emotional language:

"The Oscar-winning director is fuelling the gulf between the Republican and Democratic electoral campaigns ahead of the premiere of his documentary that slams President George W. Bush and his government's policy on Iraq. 

A highly-publicised political firestorm is helping to generate interest in the film that cost just six million dollars to make but which is expected to shatter the 24-million-dollar box office record set by Moore's Oscar-winning documentary "Bowling for Columbine." 

The row has become the focus of a pitched battle between political activists, with rival conservative and liberal grass-roots groups desperately rallying their troops to either boycott or support the film. 

Outraged by its red-hot content, which prompted the Walt Disney Co. to refuse to distribute the film, conservative Move America Forward is leading a last-ditch campaign to persuade US cinemas not to screen it …"

Obviously, Fahrenheit 9/11 is not your stereotypical short, black and white documentary spliced together in someone's bedroom.  It has enraged or engrossed hundreds of thousands of people with a highly-charged emotional assault viewers just recently experienced in another film released this spring: Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ.

It's that absolute fire and brimstone emotionalism that merits a dose of less incendiary thought, as Andrew Sullivan states in the following excerpt from his "Blinded by the Light" editorial in Time, July 12, 2004.  Sullivan elaborates that both movies replace argument with feeling and reasoned persuasion with the rawest of group loyalties: 

"It is a sign of how far the culture war has gone that almost no one condemns both movies.  If you're a Fundamentalist … [Mel] Gibson is a hero.  If you're a leftist … Moore is, in the words of the New York Times, 'a credit to the Republic.'  The truth is that both movies are different but equally potent forms of cultural toxin -- poisonous to debate, to reason, and to civility.  And the antidote is in shorter and shorter supply."

Divide and conquer.  Expose and humiliate.  Condemn and silence those who do not pledge allegiance to your groupthink absolutism.

The greatest issue Fahrenheit 9/11 raises is this  one --- there has never been a greater, more critical urgency for genuine DIALOGUE than right now. In the rest of this newsletter, you'll learn why.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DIALOGUE AS A MATTER OF SURVIVAL

Dialogue is a way of exploring the roots of the many crises that face humanity today. It enables inquiry into, and understanding of, the sorts of processes that fragment and interfere with real communication between individuals, nations, and even different parts of the same organization. 

In our modern culture men and women are able to interact with one another in many ways:  they can sing, dance or play together with little difficulty. But their ability to talk together about subjects that matter deeply to them seems invariably to lead to dispute, division, and often to violence. 

In dialogue, a group of people can explore the individual and collective presuppositions, ideas, beliefs, and feelings that subtly control their interactions. It provides an opportunity to participate in a process that can reveal the often puzzling patterns of incoherence that lead the group to avoid certain issues or, on the other hand, to insist, against all reason, on standing and defending opinions about particular issues.

Dialogue is a way of observing, collectively, how hidden values and intentions can control our behavior, and how unnoticed cultural differences can clash without our realizing what is occurring. It can therefore be seen as an arena in which collective learning takes place and out of which a sense of increased harmony, fellowship, and creativity can arise.

Because the nature of dialogue is exploratory, its meaning and its methods continue to unfold. No firm rules can be laid down for conducting a dialogue because its essence is learning -- not as the result of consuming a body of information or doctrine imparted by an authority, nor as a means of examining or criticizing a particular theory or program, but rather as part of an unfolding process of creative participation between peers.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Why dialogue?

Dialogue is concerned with providing a space that makes possible a kind of immediate mirroring back of both the content of thought and the less apparent, dynamic structures that govern it.

Each listener is able to reflect back to each speaker, and to the rest of the group, a view of some of the assumptions and unspoken implications being expressed, as well as that which is being avoided. 

Dialogue creates the opportunity for each participant to examine the preconceptions, prejudices, and the characteristic patterns that lie behind his or her thoughts, opinions, beliefs, and feelings … along with the roles he or she tends habitually to play. And it offers an opportunity to share those insights.

Dialogue allows a wide spectrum of possible relationships to be
revealed: 
--- It can disclose the impact of society on the individual and the individual's impact on society. 
--- It can display how power is assumed or given away and how pervasive are the generally unnoticed rules of the system that constitutes our culture. 

Dialogue is not concerned with deliberately trying to alter or change behavior nor to get the participants to move toward a predetermined goal.  Nevertheless, changes do occur because observed thought behaves differently from unobserved thought. 

Dialogue becomes an opportunity for thought and feeling to play freely.  Any subject can be included and no content is excluded.

Such an activity is very rare in our culture. Yet dialogue is an activity that might well prove vital to the future health of civilization as we know it here on earth.

This article expresses the thoughts of David Bohm (1917-1992), a distinguished physicist best known for his work on quantum theory and relativity theory and their implications for other fields. The ideas on dialogue are taken from an influential paper written by Bohm, Donald Factor and Peter Garrett.  For the complete paper, go to:
http://www.thedialoguegrouponline.com/whatsdialogue.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NEITHER DISCUSSION NOR DEBATE

Dialogue is not discussion, a word that shares its root meaning with "percussion" and "concussion," both of which involve breaking things up. 

It is not debate. Debate, by the very structure within which formal debates occur, is intentionally designed to win another to your point of view … or put another way, to make your point of view victorious over your opponent's. Debates have winners and losers. 

Discussions and debates are forms of conversation with an implicit tendency to point toward a goal, to hammer out an agreement, to try to solve a problem. or have one's opinion prevail.

The intentions of dialogue, debate, and discussion are quite different as you can see in the contrasts below:

DIALOGUE
--- to inquire, to learn
--- to unfold shared meaning
--- to integrate multiple perspectives
--- to uncover and examine assumptions

DEBATE AND DISCUSSION
--- to tell, sell, or persuade
--- to gain agreement on one meaning
--- to evaluate and select the best
--- to justify or defend assumptions

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BEHAVIORS THAT SUPPORT DIALOGUE 

Suspension of judgment when listening and speaking.  When we listen and suspend judgment we open the door to expanded understanding.  When we speak without judgment we open the door for others to listen to us. 

Respect for differences.  Our respect is grounded in the belief that everyone has an essential contribution to make and is to be honored for the perspective which only they can bring. 

Role and status suspension.  Again, in dialogue, all participants and their contributions are absolutely essential to developing an integrated whole view. No one perspective is more important than any other. Dialogue is about power with, as opposed to power over or power under. 

Balancing inquiry and advocacy.  In dialogue, we inquire to discover and understand others perspectives and ideas and we advocate to offer our own for consideration. The intention is to bring forth and make visible assumptions and relationships, and gain new insight and
understanding. 

We too often advocate to convince others of our positions. Therefore, a good place to start with this guideline is to practice bringing more inquiry into the conversation. 

Focus on learning.  Our intention is to learn from each other, to expand our view and understanding, instead of evaluating and determining who has the "best" point of view. 

When we are focused on learning we tend to ask more questions, try new things. We are willing to disclose our thinking so that we can see both what is working for us and what we might want to change. We want to hear from all parties so that we can gain the advantage of differing perspectives. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CREATING DIALOGUE :: FOUR SKILL BUILDING BLOCKS 

The building blocks outlined below are concepts that form a scaffolding for dialogue. Like the scaffolding used in construction to aid in the initial stages of building, they are meant to help provide an environment conducive to unfolding the process of dialoguing. 

Rather than a set of rules, think of them as reminders of the level of attention that lies at the core of dialogue. Attention to our thinking, our feelings, our communication, assumptions, and judgments. Attention to the unfolding meaning of the group, the spirit of inquiry, and the pauses for reflection that lead to learning and understanding. 

Held lightly, these building blocks will help you enter into dialogue. Held too firmly, they will trap you in just one more structure and limiting system.  Dialogue is a living process and requires the willingness of all participants to be open to letting go of the known in order to discover new perspectives and understanding. As one writer so eloquently put it, "We must be prepared in each moment to give up [our ideas of] who we are to discover all we may become. " 

So, by all means use these guidelines to help you begin your exploration of dialogue, and in each moment be prepared to release them and let your attention guide you to the next level of learning.

Suspension of Judgment 

Of all the building blocks, suspension of judgment is the foundation for dialogue … and the most challenging. Our normal way of thinking divides, organizes, and labels. Because our egos become identified with how we think things are, we often find ourselves defending our positions against those of others. This makes it difficult for us to stay open to new and alternative views of reality. It's hard to listen when we are engaged in a heated battle about "who's right and who's wrong!" 

When we learn to suspend judgment … to "hold our positions more lightly"… we open the door to see others' points of view. It is not that we do away with our judgments and opinions -- this would be impossible. We simply create a space between our judgment and our reaction, and thus open a door for listening. 

Suspending judgment is also key to building a climate of trust and safety. As we learn we will not be "judged" wrong for our opinions, we feel freer to express ourselves. The atmosphere becomes more open and truthful. 

Assumption Identification 

Identify means "to recognize, to pick out from your surroundings, to feel one with."  Assumptions are those things which are assumed or thought to be.  So, to identify assumptions is to recognize or identify that which we think is so. 

It is probably obvious to most of us that our assumptions play a large role in how we evaluate our environment, the decisions we make, and how we behave. Yet it is just this aspect of our thinking that we consistently overlook when we seek to solve problems, resolve conflicts, or create synergy among diverse people. 

Why do we overlook the obvious? David Bohm would say because our "assumptions are transparent to us". They are such a built-in part of our seeing apparatus that we do not even know they are there. We look right through them. 

Our failure to look at underlying belief systems can lead to disappointing results. When we examine the underlying assumptions behind our decisions and actions, we reach to the causal level of problem solving. We are able to identify where there are disconnects in our strategies
and take more effective actions. 

By learning how to identify our assumptions, we can also explore differences with others, work to build common ground and consensus, and get to the bottom of core misunderstandings and differences. 

Listening: Key to Perception 

Take a minute, right now, and ask yourself for your personal definition of listening. Think about the activities you identify with listening. How do you know you are listening? Being listened to? What does listening feel like? How could your listening be enhanced? 

The way we listen has a lot to do with our capacity to learn and build quality relationships with others. When we are able to suspend judgment and listen to diverse perspectives, we expand and deepen our world view. It is the act of listening that allows for integration and synthesis of new insights and possibilities.  When we listen deeply we are willing to be influenced by and learn from others. 

In dialogue, listening also involves developing our ability to perceive the meaning arising both at the individual level and within the group. What assumptions are we hearing? Which ones are shared? Listening for shared meaning informs us about the culture we live in and presents us with the opportunity to make choices about our decisions and actions rather than moving unconsciously on auto-pilot. 

Inquiry and Reflection 

Inquiry and refection are about learning how to ask questions with the intention of gaining additional insight and perspective. Through this process we dig deeply into matters that concern us and create breakthroughs in our ability to solve problems. 

Inquiry elicits information. Reflection permits the inspection of that information and the perception of relationships. The combination of reflection and inquiry enables us to learn, to think creatively, and to build on past experience versus simply repeating the same patterns over and over again. 

By learning how to ask questions that lead us to new levels of understanding, we accelerate our collective learning. Such questions often begin with "I wonder...", "what if...", "what does this mean to you?" As we ask these questions and listen, we gain greater awareness into our own and others' thinking processes and the issues that separate and unite us. 

By creating pauses to reflect, we learn to work with silence and slow down the rate of conversation. We become able to identify assumptions and reactive patterns, and open the door for new ideas and possibilities. 

Interlocking Building Blocks: Weaving the Dialogue 

Each of the building blocks is an integral part of the dialogue. They are living parts which, like the organs of our bodies, constantly work to support the form they are part of.  In each moment, the building blocks weave both the context within which the dialogue unfolds and act as catalysts to support the unfolding itself. The more consciously we use them, the more they help us to enter into and sustain the dialogue. 

And all the skills are interrelated. For example, as we begin to draw aside the curtains of our judgments, we develop the capacity to speak and listen without the automatic coloring of past thought patterns. We become less reactive, more aware of the assumptions through which
we filter our observations. 

By choosing to suspend these assumptions, we may experiment with expanding the horizons of our perceptions, increasing the number of points of view available to us.  By creating space to reflect on what we are perceiving, seeking the next level of inquiry, opening up our senses and listening deeply with the intention to discover and understand, we enter into dialogue. 

The Building Blocks and Behaviors That Support Dialogue articles are excerpted from the writings of Glenna Gerard and Linda Ellinor of The Dialogue Group. I urge you to visit The Dialogue Group site for more in-depth information about dialogues: http://www.thedialoguegrouponline.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE WORLD'S BEST "HOTTIE" AD

I opened this XYZ newsletter referencing heat.  I close with another reference to heat of a different kind.  The following arrived in my email inbox and I'm sending it along for all of you to enjoy. This appeared in the Atlanta Journal and has to be one of the most effective singles ads ever written:

SINGLE BLACK FEMALE seeks companionship, ethnicity unimportant.  I am a very good looking girl who LOVES to play. I love long walks in the woods, riding in your pickup truck, hunting, camping, fishing trips, and cozy winter nights lying by the fire.  Candlelight dinners will have me eating out of your hands.  Rub me the right way and watch me respond.  I'll be at the front door when you get home from work, wearing only what nature gave me. Kiss me and I'm yours.  Call (404) 875-6429 and ask for Daisy. 

Over 15,000 men found themselves talking to the Atlanta Humane Society about an 8-week-old Labrador Retriever. 


Thus concludes this third 2004 edition of the eXpress Yourself newZletter.  Before I close, let me remind you about our web site addresses and invite you to visit them often:

Circle of Stones: A Gathering of Women
http://www.kohlquest.com/circle.html

The Search for Stone Woman
http://www.kohlquest.com/stonewomanppt.html

KohlQuest ArtSpeak:
http://www.KQartspeak.com

Hole in the Garden Wall book: 
http://www.holeinthegardenwall.com

XYZ Newsletter subscriptions:
http://www.holeinthegardenwall.com/newsletter.html

XYZ Newsletter Archives:
http://www.kohlquest.com/xyzarchives.html

Thanks for sharing these moments with me. 
Make this day a great one, full of the blessings you desire and deserve.

Prudence Kohl, Editor
eXpress Yourself newZletter

KohlQuest Associates
3271 Polk County Line Road
Rutherfordton, NC 28139
plkohl@kohlquest.com

PLEASE NOTE:  KohlQuest does not rent or sell lists of e-mail addresses. We honor and respect the privacy of each and every one of our subscribers.

The eXpress Yourself newZletter is copyrighted © 2004 by KohlQuest.  All rights reserved. This document may not be copied in part or full without express written permission from the publisher.

To subscribe to our eXpress Yourself newZletter, go to:
http://www.holeinthegardenwall.com/newsletter.html
Or send an e-mail to: kohlquest@blueridge.net with 
"Subscribe" as the Subject.